<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>https://digitallibrary.bldedu.ac.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/439</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 12:02:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-05-20T12:02:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>A study on the role of videostroboscopy in the early detection of laryngeal changes in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease</title>
      <link>https://digitallibrary.bldedu.ac.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/6201</link>
      <description>Title: A study on the role of videostroboscopy in the early detection of laryngeal changes in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease
Authors: Kothapalli Neelima , Pratibha S.D , Sharanabassu M Andeli, Karadi RN
Abstract: Background: Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is a common cause of chronic throat and voice symptoms and &#xD;
often produces subtle mucosal and vibratory abnormalities that may not be detected on routine laryngoscopy. &#xD;
Videostroboscopy provides dynamic assessment of vocal fold function and may improve early diagnosis and severity &#xD;
stratification. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of videostroboscopy in detecting structural and functional &#xD;
laryngeal abnormalities and to determine its association with symptom severity and treatment outcomes in patients with &#xD;
suspected LPRD. Methodology: This was a prospective cross-sectional observational study conducted at the Department of &#xD;
Otorhinolaryngology, BLDEU’s Shri B.M. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Vijayapura, over the &#xD;
defined study period, including 136 patients with symptoms suggestive of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). &#xD;
Results: Females constituted 62.5% of participants. The mean RSI score was 21.05. Moderate LPR was most common &#xD;
(42.65%), followed by mild (27.21%), no/borderline (15.44%), and severe disease (14.71%). ENT examination revealed &#xD;
inflammatory changes in 86.76% of patients, with cobblestoning (25%) and erythema (20.59%) being frequent findings. &#xD;
Videostroboscopy demonstrated reduced vibratory amplitude and mucosal wave in 57.35% of patients, while abnormalities &#xD;
in symmetry, periodicity, and glottic closure were observed in all cases (100%). Reduced amplitude was present exclusively &#xD;
in moderate and severe disease, showing a strong association with severity (χ² = 272.00, p &lt; 0.0001). At one-month follow&#xD;
up, 75% of patients improved clinically. Conclusion: Videostroboscopy detects early and widespread functional vocal fold &#xD;
abnormalities and correlates strongly with disease severity, making it a valuable adjunct to routine ENT examination for &#xD;
accurate diagnosis, grading, and follow-up of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://digitallibrary.bldedu.ac.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/6201</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prophylactic intravenous phenylephrine to prevent propofol-induced hypotension during induction of general anaesthesia: a randomised clinical trial</title>
      <link>https://digitallibrary.bldedu.ac.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/6195</link>
      <description>Title: Prophylactic intravenous phenylephrine to prevent propofol-induced hypotension during induction of general anaesthesia: a randomised clinical trial
Authors: Sagar Harishchandra Pawar, Vijaykumar T Kallyanappagol, Santoshkumar Alalamath
Abstract: Introduction: Propofol is commonly used intravenous induction &#xD;
agent which are frequently complicated by peri-induction &#xD;
hypotension. Reduced Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) during &#xD;
anaesthesia contributes to significant postoperative morbidity, &#xD;
including renal and myocardial injury. Preventive strategies &#xD;
aimed at maintaining haemodynamic stability during this critical &#xD;
period are of clinical value. Phenylephrine offers a simple, rapid &#xD;
option for counteracting propofol-induced vasodilatation.&#xD;
Aim: To assess effectiveness of i.v. phenylephrine in preventing &#xD;
propofol-induced hypotension during induction of general &#xD;
anaesthesia.&#xD;
Materials and Methods: This randomised clinical trial was &#xD;
conducted from October 2024-December 2025 at Department &#xD;
of Anaesthesiology, Shri BM Patil Medical College, Hospital &#xD;
and Research Centre, BLDE DU, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India. &#xD;
The study included 130 American Society of Anaesthesiologists &#xD;
(ASA) I–II patients (18–65 years) undergoing elective general &#xD;
anaesthesia and were randomised (1:1) to receive i.v. &#xD;
phenylephrine 100 µg or saline before propofol induction. &#xD;
Primary outcome was hypotension (≥20% MAP fall). Secondary &#xD;
outcomes included Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic &#xD;
Blood Pressure (DBP), MAP, and Heart Rate (HR) at 5, 10, and &#xD;
15 minutes. Analysed using Statistical Package for the Social &#xD;
Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0, normally distributed continuous &#xD;
variables (Shapiro-Wilk test) were expressed as mean±SD and &#xD;
evaluated via independent student’s t-tests.&#xD;
Results: The control group’s average age was 37.76±15.69 &#xD;
years (50.8% female, 49.2% male), the study group averaged &#xD;
34.38±14.30 years (49.2% female, 50.8% male). Postinduction &#xD;
hypotension was lower in the study group (32.3%, n=21 vs &#xD;
73.8%, n=48; p-value &lt;0.001). At 5, 10, and 15 minutes, Group &#xD;
A maintained higher MAP, SBP, and DBP than Group B (all &#xD;
p-value &lt;0.001), Group A vs Group B MAP was 87.88±8.694 &#xD;
vs 79.45±9.384 (p-value &lt;0.001), 86.51±9.045 vs 74.86±9.890 &#xD;
(p-value &lt;0.001), and 87.60±9.375 vs 77.55±8.816 mmHg &#xD;
(p-value &lt;0.001); SBP was 117.80±10.145 vs 107.48±11.172 &#xD;
(p-value &lt;0.001), 116.46±10.827 vs 102.37±11.870 (p-value &#xD;
&lt;0.001), and 117.43±11.243 vs 105.25±10.070 mmHg (p-value &#xD;
&lt;0.001); DBP was 71.45±9.038 vs 65.18±9.084 (p-value &lt;0.001), &#xD;
70.20±9.00 vs 60.98±8.977 (p-value &lt;0.001), and 71.32±9.059 &#xD;
vs 63.45±8.646 mmHg (p-value &lt;0.001). Group A HR was &#xD;
lower at 10 minutes (88.60±11.900 vs 93.29±14.021 bpm, &#xD;
p-value=0.009) and 15 minutes (85.18±11.144 vs 91.75±12.668 &#xD;
bpm, p-value=0.001).&#xD;
Conclusion: A single 100 µg bolus of phenylephrine administered &#xD;
immediately before induction with propofol effectively &#xD;
attenuated peri-induction hypotension and maintained stable &#xD;
haemodynamic. This simple intervention improves perioperative &#xD;
safety in patients at risk of hypotension.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://digitallibrary.bldedu.ac.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/6195</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under general anaesthesia .</title>
      <link>https://digitallibrary.bldedu.ac.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/5630</link>
      <description>Title: Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under general anaesthesia .
Authors: Sanjana Prabhu, Vidya Patil, Anusha Suntan.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://digitallibrary.bldedu.ac.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/5630</guid>
      <dc:date>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Perfusion index as an early predictor of postspinal hypotension in elective lower segment cesarean section.</title>
      <link>https://digitallibrary.bldedu.ac.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/5628</link>
      <description>Title: Perfusion index as an early predictor of postspinal hypotension in elective lower segment cesarean section.
Authors: Akshata M, Anusha Suntan, Santosh Alalmath, Nirmala Devi.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://digitallibrary.bldedu.ac.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/5628</guid>
      <dc:date>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

