Abstract:
INTRODUCTION
Surgical wound infection is nightmare for any surgeon following elective and
emergency operations. In recent studies, the possibility of reducing Surgical site
infection(SSI) by perioperative hyperoxygenation has been raised. Hypoxia at the
level of local wound site retards proper healing. Proper oxygenation of the tissue
through microcirculation is vital for the healing process and for resistance to
infection. The data obtained from the related randomized, controlled trials for the
benefits of perioperative hyperoxygenation to reduce SSI remain controversial. To
overcome this problem, we have performed a randomized, controlled trial in a patient
population with a single diagnosis (acute appendicitis), using standard surgical
approach (open appendicectomy).
AIMS AND OBJECTIVE
To know the effects of hyperoxygenation on surgical site infection following
open appendicectomy in the patient having acute appendicitis in forms of ASEPSIS
criteria, duration of hospital stay and cost effectiveness.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This was a prospective case control study conducted at BLDEU’s shri B. M.
Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Vijayapur from Oct 2015 to Aug
2017 and included 180 patients with Acute appendicitis and in each group 90 patients
were allotted. A total of 180 patients who underwent open surgery for acute
appendicitis, Preoperative intravenous antibiotics were given to all patients. In the
control group, 90 patients received oxygen from the room air, while in the study
group, the fraction of inspired oxygen(FIO2) reached 80% with the use of
nonrebreathing mask in the rest 90 patients and continued for 2 hours in the recovery
XI
room following completion of the operation in the study group with high-flow oxygen
(10 L/min) through a nonrebreathing mask, while control group received oxygen from
room air. We used the ASEPSIS system score to assess the degree of healing and
infection of the surgical wound. The results of the two groups were compared and
analyzed.
RESULTS
The post operative SSI according to ASESPIS criteria, mean hospitalization,
use of antibiotics and cost effectiveness were assessed and P values derived and
compared between the two groups. In our study we noticed marked difference in
requirement of antibiotic in control group (98.9%) as compare to study group (1.1%)
making it significant. In study group 5 (5.6%) patients had surgical site infection
while in control group 17 (18.9%) patients had surgical site infection as per ASEPSIS
score. Control group has average stay of 7.6+2 days while study group has 6.4+2.4
days which is statistically lower in study group. Cost of treatment in study group is
significantly lower than the control group.
CONCLUSION
The use of perioperative hyperoxygenation is advantageous in operations for
acute appendicitis. As this is the most common emergent operation in general surgery,
decreasing the rate of SSI carries significant clinical and economical gains in the form
of judicious use of antibiotics, shorter hospital stay and cost effectiveness. In addition,
as our study was conducted in a relatively homogeneous study population, our results
support the beneficial effects of supplemental oxygen in clean contaminated surgery
in general.