To Assess The Awareness Of The Radiation Safety And Hazards Among Health Care Proffesionals

Abstract

Radiation security is generally called radiological protection and is portrayed by the Worldwide Thermal power Agency(IAEA) as "The confirmation of people from frightful effects of receptiveness to ionizing radiation"(1).Radiation affirmation is the justification for the prosperity of the two patients and clinical staff during radiographic frameworks, as a result of its unpleasant effects tended to through malignant growth causing nature and skin disorder(2,3).The Worldwide Commission on Radiological Security (ICRP)stated that a cognizance and experience with the risks of radiation among clinical staff can thwart futile risks forward people as a whole(4,5).Every year, endless researchers show stress over radiation sources and the effects that occurred by it all over the planet. 80% of our receptiveness to ionizing radiation comes from typical wellsprings of which radon gas is overwhelmingly the most basic, while the other20% comes from man-made sources, mainly clinical X-beams (6,7,8). While reports from studies displayed a sensational climb in the inescapability of negative prosperity impacts following receptiveness to ionizing radiation throughout recent many years (9,10) the documented confirmation of lamentable data of radiation security among various units of prosperity workers in danger of word related transparency shows the enormity of the issue at and (11,12,13). Subsequently, the data on radiation risks and the point of convergence for radiation security considering this speculation that is 'the ALARA thought' this includes that radiation transparency is diminished to 'As Low as Really Achievable (ALARA)' however not outperforming the end on strong piece proposed by the Overall Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP).The Worldwide Commission on Radiological Protection(ICRP) and thermal power managerial board (AERB) has suggested Radiological protection guidelines. The overall knowledge assessment, based on a sample size of 420 participants, revealed that the total correct answers ranged from 13 to 20, with a mean score of 16.79 and a standard deviation of 1.782. The Mann- Whitney U test indicated no significant difference, with a p value of 0.148. Additionally, the total wrong answers ranged from 0 to 7, with a mean score of 3.21 and a standard deviation of 1.782 of the study to assess the awareness of the radiation safety and hazards among the health care professionals. Conclusion: The assessment of radiation safety and hazard awareness among healthcare from 13 to 20, with a mean score of 16.79 and a standard deviation of 1.782. The Mann Whitney U test indicated no significant difference, with a p-value of 0.148. Additionally, the wrong answers ranged from 0 to 7, with a mean score of 3.21 and a standard deviation of 1.782. This suggests a moderate level of knowledge among healthcare professionals regarding radiation safety and hazards, with no significant variation in scores. professionals, based on a sample of 420 participants, revealed that the correct answers ranged